Civil Beat Data

2020-49: Conducted personal business on duty by meeting with a female acquaintance for nonwork-related matters. Sent multiple inappropriate text messages and/or confidential police information to the female. Criminal Conduct Initiated: Harassment Kidnapping Sexual Assault in the Second Degree Sexual Assault in the Fourth Degree (Prosecutors not notified because unable to establish the elements of a crime.)

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

Name: Mark Montez

Criminal behavior Sexual harassment or misconduct Sexual Assault Unprofessional conduct

2020-57: Made an inappropriate comment of a sexual nature during a staff meeting. (Officer retired prior to suspension.)

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

Name: Darren Izumo

Sexual harassment or misconduct

2020-58: Directed an inappropriate comment of a sexual nature to an employee.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:Pending grievance

Union Intervention: Yes

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct Cop on cop

2019-2: Made inappropriate comments of a sexual nature to a coworker. (Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 1 day to a written reprimand.)

Disciplinary action: Written reprimand-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: Yes

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct

2019-6: Displayed material of a sexual nature to subordinate officers.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct

2018-2: Failed to report and document an incident of sexual harassment. (Pursuant to the grievance process, Civil Service Commission (CSC) vacated the 5-day suspension as there ,was insufficient evidence to support the allegations. The CSC determined that the officer's explanation regarding his actions and decisions was credible. The officer notified his supervisors about the sexual harassment incident, and he was not informed about resolving the situation in a different manner.)

Disciplinary action: No action-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: Yes

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct Administrative

2018-7: Made inappropriate comments which violated the department's sexual harassment policy.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct

2018-9: Made inappropriate and offensive comments, which violated the department's sexual harrassment policy.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct

2017-8: Offered to use police powers to help a female suspect in exchange for sexual favors. Failed to remain impartial. Used the departmental computer and provided confidential information to the female suspect. Devised a scheme to defraud and deprive through bribery. Criminal Conduct Initiated: Department of the Attorney General investigation.

Disciplinary action: Discharged

Status:Final

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:No

Name: Maulia Labarre

Abuse of power Criminal behavior Sexual harassment or misconduct

2017-22: As a supervisor, sent an e-mail that contained material of a sexual nature to a subordinate female officer. (Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 5 days to 3 days.)

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:Final

Union Intervention: Yes

Prosecutors notified:No

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Sexual harassment or misconduct

Honolulu Police Misconduct

Disciplinary Actions, 2000 - 2023

About this tool

Refine List

Days Suspended

Type of Misconduct

Year

Status

Prosecutors Notified

Union Intervention

Honolulu Police Misconduct

2020-57: Made an inappropriate comment of a sexual nature during a staff meeting. (Officer retired prior to suspension.)

2020-58: Directed an inappropriate comment of a sexual nature to an employee.

2019-2: Made inappropriate comments of a sexual nature to a coworker. (Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 1 day to a written reprimand.)

2019-6: Displayed material of a sexual nature to subordinate officers.

2018-7: Made inappropriate comments which violated the department's sexual harassment policy.

2018-9: Made inappropriate and offensive comments, which violated the department's sexual harrassment policy.

2017-22: As a supervisor, sent an e-mail that contained material of a sexual nature to a subordinate female officer. (Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 5 days to 3 days.)