Civil Beat Data

2013-20: The officer repeatedly texted and called an ex-girlfriend after being asked to stop and being told the contact was unwanted.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Criminal behavior

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-21: On numerous occasions, the officer conducted personal business while on duty, improperly used the city e-mail system, violated special duty policy, and released confidential information to an unauthorized party. The officer accessed the helipad without proper authorization.

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Other

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-22: The officer failed to declare a motor vehicle pursuit in accordance with departmental policy.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Administrative

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-23: The officer forged a supervisor’s signature on two official forms.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Falsification of records Criminal behavior

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-24: While on duty, in uniform, and in view of the public, the officer argued with a coworker and challenged him to a fight. After the confrontation, the officer telephoned the coworker as a continuation of the incident.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Unprofessional conduct Cop on cop

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-25: While on duty, in uniform, and in view of the public, the officer argued with a coworker and challenged him to a fight.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Unprofessional conduct Cop on cop

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-26: As the supervisor, the officer failed to ensure subordinate officers turned in initial and follow-up reports.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Administrative

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-27: The officer failed to submit a follow-up report for his deployment of oleoresin capsicum (pepper spray) during an incident that occurred while off duty.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Weapons misconduct

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-28: The officer provided false information regarding a special duty assignment.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Lying Falsification of records

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2013-29: The officer repeatedly texted and called an estranged spouse even after being told it was unwanted and a harassment report was initiated.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Criminal behavior

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

Honolulu Police Misconduct

Disciplinary Actions, 2000 - 2025

About this tool

Refine List

Days Suspended

Type of Misconduct

Year

Status

Prosecutors Notified

Union Intervention

Honolulu Police Misconduct

2013-20: The officer repeatedly texted and called an ex-girlfriend after being asked to stop and being told the contact was unwanted.

2013-21: On numerous occasions, the officer conducted personal business while on duty, improperly used the city e-mail system, violated special duty policy, and released confidential information to an unauthorized party. The officer accessed the helipad without proper authorization.

2013-22: The officer failed to declare a motor vehicle pursuit in accordance with departmental policy.

2013-23: The officer forged a supervisor’s signature on two official forms.

2013-24: While on duty, in uniform, and in view of the public, the officer argued with a coworker and challenged him to a fight. After the confrontation, the officer telephoned the coworker as a continuation of the incident.

2013-25: While on duty, in uniform, and in view of the public, the officer argued with a coworker and challenged him to a fight.

2013-26: As the supervisor, the officer failed to ensure subordinate officers turned in initial and follow-up reports.

2013-27: The officer failed to submit a follow-up report for his deployment of oleoresin capsicum (pepper spray) during an incident that occurred while off duty.

2013-28: The officer provided false information regarding a special duty assignment.

2013-29: The officer repeatedly texted and called an estranged spouse even after being told it was unwanted and a harassment report was initiated.