Nearly once a week, on average, a Honolulu police officer is disciplined for misconduct. Yet the details of that bad behavior are never publicly revealed. More than a quarter of those incidents can be classified as criminal behavior — assaults, domestic violence, fleeing the scene of an accident, even criminal convictions. Civil Beat used annual summaries of misconduct provided to the Legislature by the Honolulu Police Department to compile 20 years of disciplinary action into an interactive database. Recent years include more information about officer misconduct, including whether an incident was sent to prosecutors or a disciplinary action was challenged by the union.
2017-14: Entered a van without permission and maliciously used physical force against the occupant. Used overbearing and oppressive conduct while under the color of his police authority. Failed to initiate and submit a police report to document his actions. Used his HPD-issued electric gun in an unlawful and unreasonable manner and failed to notify a supervisor.
Criminal Conduct Initiated: Unauthorized Entry Into Motor Vehicle in the First Degree
(Prosecutor not notifief because unable to locate compainant.)
2017-8: Offered to use police powers to help a female suspect in exchange for sexual favors. Failed to remain impartial. Used the departmental computer and provided confidential information to the female suspect. Devised a scheme to defraud and deprive through bribery.
Criminal Conduct Initiated: Department of the Attorney General investigation.
2017-5: As a supervisor, retaliated against a subordinate officer by speaking to the subordinate officer in an unprofessional manner.
(Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 1 day to a written reprimand.)
2016-36: Failed to remain impartial when he contacted another officer and told him not to attend court so that an Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an intoxicant case would be dismissed.
(Pursuant to the grievance process, suspension reduced from 10 days to 5 days.)
2015-63: Handcuffed the individual and drove him to a location where he threatened him. Damaged the individual's property. Did not submit appropriate incident reports to document his actions during the incident.
Criminal Conduct Initiated:
Theft in the Third Degree
(Did not notify prosecutor because complainant did not want to prosecute.)