Days Suspended

Type of Misconduct

Year

Status

Prosecutors Notified

Union Intervention

Honolulu Police Misconduct

2015-14: Collected mileage fees that he was not entitled to. Falsely recorded his court mileage. (Pursuant to grievance process, suspension reduced from 10 days to 6 days.)

6-day suspension
Final
Yes
Yes
N/A

2015-18: Inappropriately touched a female driver during a traffic stop.

Discharged
Final
Yes
Yes
Kramer Aoki

2015-21: Stole a jacket that belonged to another officer. Was improperly attired in his uniform without his duty belt. (Pursuant to grievance process, suspension reduced from 10 days to 5 days.)

5-day suspension
Final
Yes
Yes
N/A

2015-22: Was involved in a verbal argument with his girlfriend which turned physical when he pushed her. Was involved in an argument with a taxi driver. Entered the taxi and threw out property belonging to the driver. Damaged the taxi door. (Pursuant to grievance process, suspension reduced from 10 days to 5 days.)

5-day suspension
Final
Yes
Yes
N/A

2015-29: Kicked and struck two males and pushed a female while looking for a suspect in a game room. Falsified a report. Failed to check on the injured parties or provide them with emergency services. (FBI investigation)

Discharged
Final
No
No

2015-30: Did not intervene or report wrongdoing by another officer. Failed to check on the injured parties or provide them wither emergency services. (FBI investigation)

Discharged
Final
No
No

2015-31: Did not intervene or report wrongdoing by another officer. Failed to check on the injured parties or provide them wither emergency services. (FBI investigation)

Discharged
Final
No
No

2015-32: Committed criminal acts of a sexual nature against the victim.

Discharged
Arbitration
Yes
Yes

2015-34: Intentionally damaged a vehicle and slammed the driver's door on the victim, causing injury. (Pursuant to grievance process, suspension reduced from 1 day to written reprimand.)

Written reprimand-day suspension
Final
Yes
No
N/A

2015-35: Covertly recorded a meeting and attempted to reveal the recording to another party. (During the grievance process, we were provided with additional clarification that substantially contradicted the original evidence presented. It was no longer clear that the recording had occurred or that it was done by the accused officer.)

Rescinded-day suspension
Final
Yes
No
N/A
2016-01