Civil Beat Data

2002-36: Failed to properly direct and supervise a subordinate and failed to investigate and take appropriate action upon discovery of possible misconduct by a subordinate. Failed to notify watch commander of the possible misconduct of the subordinate.

Disciplinary action: 5-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Other

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-37: Failed to properly direct and command a subordinate and failed to take appropriate action upon discovering the subordinate may have committed a crime.

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Other

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-38: Improperly secured departmental equipment at the scene of a motor vehicle collision.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Other

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-39: Left a special duty assignment prior to the official end of shift to work another special duty assignment, causing the company to be overbilled.

Disciplinary action: 8-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Administrative

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-40: Failed to notify dispatch upon arrival and return from a case, which resulted in the officer becoming unavailable for further assignments. Failed to return to assigned station during the same night as directed by immediate supervisor.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Insubordination

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-41: Was insubordinate and made threatening remarks about an immediate supervisor to other officers.

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Intimidation Insubordination Cop on cop

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-42: During an unscheduled inspection the officer was without the necessary issued equipment and failed to repair the officer’s damaged subsidized vehicle within the allotted time.

Disciplinary action: 1-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Administrative

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-43: Provided false information to obtain a special duty assignment for which the officer was not eligible.

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Lying Falsification of records

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-44: Provided false information to obtain a special duty assignment for which the officer was not eligible.

Disciplinary action: 10-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Lying Falsification of records

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

2002-45: Made comments about a subordinate to other officers. Also, slapped the subordinate’s head on one occasion and physically restrained the subordinate from responding to a case.

Disciplinary action: 3-day suspension

Status:N/A

Union Intervention: No

Prosecutors notified:N/A

             Name:
            
                            N/A

Assault Abuse of power Cop on cop

Incidents involving same officer: N/A

Honolulu Police Misconduct

Disciplinary Actions, 2000 - 2022

About this tool

Refine List

Days Suspended

Type of Misconduct

Year

Status

Prosecutors Notified

Union Intervention

Honolulu Police Misconduct

2002-36: Failed to properly direct and supervise a subordinate and failed to investigate and take appropriate action upon discovery of possible misconduct by a subordinate. Failed to notify watch commander of the possible misconduct of the subordinate.

2002-37: Failed to properly direct and command a subordinate and failed to take appropriate action upon discovering the subordinate may have committed a crime.

2002-38: Improperly secured departmental equipment at the scene of a motor vehicle collision.

2002-39: Left a special duty assignment prior to the official end of shift to work another special duty assignment, causing the company to be overbilled.

2002-40: Failed to notify dispatch upon arrival and return from a case, which resulted in the officer becoming unavailable for further assignments. Failed to return to assigned station during the same night as directed by immediate supervisor.

2002-41: Was insubordinate and made threatening remarks about an immediate supervisor to other officers.

2002-42: During an unscheduled inspection the officer was without the necessary issued equipment and failed to repair the officer’s damaged subsidized vehicle within the allotted time.

2002-43: Provided false information to obtain a special duty assignment for which the officer was not eligible.

2002-44: Provided false information to obtain a special duty assignment for which the officer was not eligible.

2002-45: Made comments about a subordinate to other officers. Also, slapped the subordinate’s head on one occasion and physically restrained the subordinate from responding to a case.